TrainDad

My son loves trains, so I'm along for the ride.

TrainDad random header image

Announcing: add-on couplers for Geotrax

October 30th, 2007 · 3 Comments

I’m sorry I haven’t posted in a while. I’ve been locked deep in the Top Secret Under­ground Lab­o­ra­tory, wear­ing my big gog­gles while stir­ring large vats of bub­bling green goo. I’ve finally emerged, and beyond the crazed look in my eyes you might notice a bit of a sparkle, because I’ve got some­thing good for you Geo­t­rax fans.

Yup, easy add-on cou­plers. Has any­one else noticed that fewer and fewer Geo­t­rax vehi­cles can be hooked together? What really got me going was the Friend­liest Team–twin trol­leys, Chatty and Chirpy, that are so friendly they can’t cou­ple to each other or any­one else. No hooks, no loops, noth­ing. What does that mean to my 3-year-old? The trol­leys sit off to the side, because play­ing with them means it’s hard to play with any­thing else. No trains, no long lines of every-car-we-own con­sists. For a kid who loves trains, that’s what it’s all about. So I decided to do some­thing about it.

What I’ve ended up with are molded plas­tic cou­plers that can be attached to any Geo­t­rax vehi­cle. (Or any­thing else in the world, for that mat­ter, though I’m not sure why you would, but hey–you buy, I’ll sell, whether you stick them on your Geo­t­rax or on your pink plas­tic flamingo. No dif­fer­ence to me.) Since the Geo­t­rax line has a wide vari­ety of “bumpers” where there should be cou­plers, I’ve made them with a mount­ing sur­face that fits as many as pos­si­ble. Over time, I might make a few dif­fer­ent vari­eties to fit a few spe­cific vehi­cles that are prob­lem­atic, but don’t hold your breath… this generic ver­sion fits almost everything.

I should have pic­tures and more detailed infor­ma­tion up by tomor­row, along with pric­ing and order­ing info. My goal is not to get rich off of these; they won’t be out­ra­geous. Stay tuned!

→ 3 CommentsTags: Train Toys

Big day — Thomas, and Aero too!

October 6th, 2007 · 1 Comment

Today our lit­tle guy, Jonathan, turned three years old. The biggest adven­ture cen­tered around “Day Out With Thomas” at the North Car­olina Trans­porta­tion Museum. This event hosted the “real” Thomas — the live steam Porter-conversion brought in from the Strass­burg (In case you don’t know, the major­ity of these events use non-powered ver­sions that rely on local power). I’ve not planned on par­tic­i­pat­ing in one of these events, because the price is crazy for some­thing that you don’t even really get to expe­ri­ence. I mean, if you could actu­ally ride on Thomas him­self, that would be some­thing spe­cial; but rid­ing in a pas­sen­ger car behind Thomas is no dif­fer­ent than rid­ing in the same car behind any other loco­mo­tive. And doing it with 400 other scream­ing tod­dlers isn’t exactly my idea of a “day out” — a day out of my mind, more like it. In any case, a lov­ing uncle bought tick­ets, so there we were.

The ride was about what I expected; Jonathan enjoyed it, though, and I’m glad we had the oppor­tu­nity. We got much more excite­ment out of watch­ing Thomas drive. If you go to one of these events, I rec­om­mend ask­ing right up front where the best view­ing loca­tion is to see Thomas start up. That’s the excit­ing moment, as he belches smoke and steam and the dri­ving wheels slip. We also watched him from above, stand­ing on a bridge. He tooted his tinny Eng­lish whis­tle once as he went under, his engi­neer lean­ing out the win­dow and waving.

One of the things Jonathan enjoyed most was the Norfolk-Southern engine on a side track. They allowed vis­i­tors into the cab, let them sit in the driver’s seat and han­dle the con­trols. With the engine run­ning, it was a great expe­ri­ence to push the throt­tle and hear the diesel roar. And it’s always a delight to blow the horn!

Other high­lights included rides on a “caboose train” and a large HO-scale model rail­road set up by a local club.

Finally, Jonathan received a Geo­T­rax Grand Cen­tral Sta­tion set as a birth­day gift. This is the “expanded set” with extra cars and a DVD. JB was so excited he just didn’t know how to express it. Aero is his new favorite — he asked if he could sleep with Aero tonight.

Lots to talk about over the next few days… notes on Thomas and Geo­t­rax and Track­Mas­ter and more. Stay tuned!

→ 1 CommentTags: Destinations · Train Toys

Trackmaster and Geotrax: play nice!

October 4th, 2007 · 5 Comments

I’m get­ting a lot of inter­est in get­ting Track­mas­ter and Geo­t­rax trains and track to work together. With­out any mod­i­fi­ca­tions, here’s how they work:

  • Geo­t­rax trains run eas­ily on both the old blue track and the new brown. They don’t have a trac­tion sur­face (track top), how­ever, so they can’t pull much.
  • The wheels on Track­mas­ter cars will fit between the rails on Geo­t­rax track, although they have a very bumpy ride.
  • Unfor­tu­nately, the drive wheels on Track­mas­ter engines are a tiny bit too wide to fit between Geo­t­rax rails. That means you can’t run Track­mas­ter engines on Geotrax.

I assume that’s the sticky wicket; I think peo­ple are want­ing to run Thomas on Geo­t­rax, not the other way around.

I’ve been pon­der­ing this for a while, and I don’t have a good solu­tion. There is a cheap Thomas (the $6 Pull-Back) that is approx­i­mately the same size and pro­por­tions as Geo­t­rax trains, but it’s not a sim­ple con­ver­sion to mount the shell on a Geo engine. As Geo­t­rax trains get big­ger, due to adding the gear com­plex­i­ties of reverse and the abil­ity to fit lit­tle peo­ple inside, those pull-back shells seem smaller each day. The trains in the Mail Deliv­ery set have similarly-sized shells: just a bit too small to make an easy con­ver­sion. Does any­one know of a Thomas toy that is a lit­tle big­ger than the pull-backs? For exam­ple, how large is the whistle-and-go Thomas?

You can always put a Track­mas­ter Thomas on the back of a Geo­t­rax gon­dola, then tell the kids that Thomas broke down and Geo has to save him!

Any thoughts? I’d love to develop a sim­ple and inex­pen­sive con­ver­sion that peo­ple could eas­ily do themselves.

→ 5 CommentsTags: Train Toys

Geotrax, you’re insulting my 3-year-old’s intelligence!

October 1st, 2007 · 2 Comments

My son saw a photo of the Rope ‘N Ride Ranch and imme­di­ately said, “where’s the smokestack?”

Quick to be help­ful, I answered, “It’s right over h… uh… where’s the smokestack?”

That’s right. Geo­t­rax, well known for their great detail (check out the horse­shoe prints on the hill), for­got to put a smoke­stack on this steamer.

This is an engine rem­i­nis­cent of the clas­sic 4–4-0 Amer­i­can. But it doesn’t have a ten­der, either; that only leaves three options.

  1. Maybe it’s a sad­dle tanker (just being obvi­ous here, since it has sad­dle tanks on the sides). But a sad­dle tanker needs a smoke­stack, so this really isn’t an option after all.
  2. Maybe it’s a “fire­less.” That’s the only kind of steam engine with­out a smoke­stack; it’s just a big tank that would be charged with steam. But then it doesn’t need the sad­dle tanks, so what’s up?
  3. Maybe it’s a fake — a gas or diesel or elec­tric engine that just has a steam-like facade built around it. We fre­quently take rides on a sim­i­lar “steam engine” locally. Unlikely, though, since they are plac­ing this in the era of the Old West. The great irony of this pos­si­bil­ity, of course, is that it really is an elec­tric engine made to look like a steam engine.

While I’m whin­ing about picky lit­tle things, I might as well give you one more: the Ama­zon page linked above lists the engine’s name as “Rusty the Steam Engine.” Not quite right: Fisher-Price named it “Old Rust” and even trade­marked the name.

→ 2 CommentsTags: Train Toys